Cinebench r23 vs 2024 reddit Let's bench some CBR24 GPU. 5 degrees and peak power 122. When using xmp @8000 it will g ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2023 G614JV-AS73) GeForce RTX 4060 (140 W TDP), Intel Core i7-13650HX" 16 GB DDr5 RAM ( 8 GB*2) NB: Cinebench R23 FULL CPU : ARMORY CRATE MANUAL MODE + CPU PL1 140W + CPU PL2 175W + GPU Defaults Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. Been messing around with my 9900k and got a Cinebench r23 multi core score of 13,470 on a Corsair 240mm AIO. Cinebench is on the higher side. if you turned off MCE/unlimited power than you should be at 37-39k. 950MHz vs 5. 2ghz is max, at 1. Troubleshooting: I've tried tuning PBO, power limits, temp limits, voltage, max boost etc. We also sometime talk about other canon equipment such as printers. Im gonna download cinebench r24 to see why those scores seem off. 4. Interesting side note, with thermal limit for the CPU set to 90 degrees it’s basically matched at 89 with R23, with 78-79 max on CB 2024. Also, "estimating" the Cinebench 2024 power by re-using the already-dubious measurements from Cinebench R23 is heinous bullshit. I have the same undervolt and am getting 1465 single core, 14,676 multicore. #=====# The goal of this community is to provide a wide variety of information for those considering an AMD laptop. I have seen many threads with scores up to around 31k. Will add missing scores when I am finished with everything. Auto it would probably be even lower but havent tested yet. - Multi core R23 bench was 20627 (stock @ 77C sustained temp) and 21123 (PBO - 90C sustained rose to and stayed at 90C quite quickly). Averages around 92C however and Thermal Throttles a bit on 2024 but a lot on R23. Interesting to note that M3 pro still does consistently better than M2 pro with 2 less P cores, so ppl can stop with all the "downgrade" posts lmao. i7 12700k cinebench r23 score At stock got 23363 score in multicore which is considerable higher than 22300 than the average chips get - May have hit the silicone lottery but. 2 nvme SSD you need to update the MB bios to f6a first or it won't recognize the M. 5c. 7 with pbo set to enhanced 1. My Cinebench 2024 Multi Score with pbo curve -30 barely reaches over 1000. Only set the below in BIOS. Cinebench CPU results aren't really that useful coz it doesn't make sense to use the CPU to render when GPUs are so much faster and more efficient at the task. If it doesn't, then the TDP reduction is wasted on downgraded cooling. That's huge when you're on battery, really doubt the 12700H can sustain that performance while unplugged. I gained a bit more than 100 pts in Cinebench 2024 with a score of 1988 in my last run with a bunch of stuff running in the background! Free performance is free performance, even if it's a smallish gain. R23 would max it out at 58W or so but 2024 only goes up to 52W. RX 7800 XT does superbly well in games and programs that actually do something but if you just want Cinebench epeen then it's not a good choice. For the Price, you can't beat the performance or thermals. With the default "optimized" settings of my MB at 280 W PL1 and PL2, I would score around 2200. I still see some pretty low Cinebench R23 multicore scores, for some reason, at around 27,500 in Performance mode (no other tweaks) - and that appears to be the same as the OP of this post. but assuming a 13900k, if your running unlimited power you should be at 39-40+. cinebench r23. Jan 9, 2024 · I now realize my mistake which was that I was using Cinebench 2024 instead of Cinebench R23. I'm new to OC but currently my testing has gone something like 30 mins OCCT -> 2 hours Prime95 -> Cinebench R23 -> 3DMark cpu tests and finally 8 or so hours prime95 while I'm asleep. COMMENT=Results Disclaimer - CINEBENCH results are indicative of overall system performance when using CINEMA 4D, COMMENT=and do not necessarily reflect the performance of the tested hardware with other applications. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. Multi core 24566 Single core 1825 Using Lenovo Legion Pro 5i and using performance mode set on extreme via bios. 100 watts in cinebench and 150 watts in prime95. My 13600k's undervolted Watts vs Cinebench R23. 6ghz allcore for the entire test. 4. 3 degrees and peak power 78W CPU Multicore (w/ PBO enabled) - scored 777 with peak temp 79. With it set to enhanced 1 in the MSI BIOS it reaches only 947. Decided to run cinebench r23(from Microsoft store), Liquid freezer 2 max speed 45C max single core, 67C max multi core. Edit1. Leak vs. Sticking with 8 cores in a tiny die comes with scaling issues at high TDP, i. Nobody knows if that will ever change with a future version or driver update. 5k multi score, 1900 single). I'm gonna guess hes excited because the front end is going to get fattened up similar to what intel did with alderlake, which provided a nice IPC gain and flexed better branch prediction. Not every benchmark does pull the same Power on the cpu side. it didnt throttle in my tests too. Hey, I have a kinda weird problem for me so basically my 6700k@4,5GHZ 1,33V Power saving features Disabled(Windows and Bios)… i dont have references to backup this assumption other than people on the internet saying it, but i think the system is configured so that in perf mode the cpu gets just as hot as its allowed to when having a cpu only load (like cinebench) without thermal throttling. It seems like AMD has a greater than expected efficency on FPU AVX workloads. Bios settings are XMP set to profile 1 and multicore enhancement set to "Auto- let bios optimize". Still learning everything from scratch. 26K at 55W looks well for CPU performance on battery power! They still have the element 31 problems I bet as I did have a re paste job done on my M18 r1 several months ago and back then hovered around 29k r23 which now I do get 31300 or around it on cinebench r23 in balanced mode that in my experience has been the number one problem with the m 18s as well as other brands not just alienware/dell might add. The CPU is completely stock and not running eco mode or anything, temperatures still go up to 95 during testing. This is great news, but does not mean a 30% IPC uplift in games, office, productivity etc. Thanks! The score of 16800 they got (with unspecified TDP) is basically the ceiling for this chip before thermal throttling kicks in. I'm running completely stock settings with a Noctua nh-d15 cooler (single fan due to ram clearance) on a b550 board (haven't updated bios yet) with 32gb of 3600 ram. Please note in your post if you are using stock thermal paste/pads vs aftermarket. Cinebench 2024 scores on Apple chips have insane single core performance that is not reflected in the R23 benchmark. Cinebench 2024 Multi-Core: 660 pts Single Core: 100 pts Cinebench r23: Multi-Core: 11058 pts Single Core: 1692 pts Cinebench 2024 scores. Using Prime95, I sustain 4. 5k in high performance mode. My cooler busted so I reset everything while troubleshooting 🙄 (thanks msi) 🤌🏾. I have no data to compare to, so was wondering if this is a suitable score for my i9-13900k. I redid my Multi Core test with Cinebench R23 and my score was 28,783. Not sure why. Here's my results while having a few browsers open and game launchers among other things including it being on an old install of windows that has been carried over to a few different systems without performing a clean install. Dec 26, 2024 · Cinebench 2024 seems to reward higher memory speeds which may or may not be desirable. Ram makes some difference, you defiantly want dual channel ddr4 as ddr4 runs better in dual channel versus a single stick. 2 port being populated. And if youre didnt like leak, you shouldn’t be here before 4th november. Youre contradicting yourself. Not bad for 15 Watt. I did each Cinebench pass in a 10 minute run, but also ran a 30 minute and 1 hour run on my NH-D14 to make its results as hot as possible - you will see why later. 2ghz. I managed to get the curve stable enough to test. Neither LTT nor any other techtuber from what I've seen, has transitioned to Cinebench 2024, which is what you have there, 2024 scores are vastly lower than previous versions. Used Intel XTU utility AI Assist. When estimating you computer speed ask yourself what is the most frequent and heavy task you’re doing on the PC. I wonder if that means RAM timings will start to make a difference in scores because it seems like R23 doesn't really care how fast your RAM is. Gonna compare it to my 13700KF EDIT: Just did some tests. With the 5800x3d, my understanding is that single core is going to be relatively consistent across chips with decent cooling, and multicore might vary up to a cap with even better cooling. 8K multi in R23. ggEvhRknhD3U Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. 2ghz allcore 14180 not throttling at all. Below are the teaks I made for those interested. 25v ) just im guessing ,for me 5. I don't use Cinebench a whole lot, but just when I want to quickly check some temps and I downloaded R23 version in February I'm unfamiliar with whether or not Cinebench rolls out updates throughout the year but if they do, then I haven't updated since I first installed it Cinebench just a quick way to compare CPU horsepowers. 3k in cinebench r23 multi core, a 1255u should definitely score more I had pretty bad scores until I upgraded the Nvidia drivers from their site. For my setup, setting limits around 150-200W drops max temps (and thus fan speeds) to 70-80C, and the worst case drop in cinebench score is a few percent (3 to 4%ish. Presets & Cinebench R23 score: PBO: all around 18100 (@4865MHz 81C) PBO -20 mV: 18277 18496 18388 18448 18483 (@4925MHz 80C) PBO -30 mV: 18756 18700 18673 18706 18706 (@4965MHz 80C) PBO -40 mV: 18875 18945 19015 19073 19132 (@5039MHz 79C) Conclusion: Since AMD locked the chip, there aint much I can tinker with. Those CPUs are quite power hungry and mine even shown throttling flag (but it lasted under 1 second) on one of the cores with 420 AIO (Arctic Liquid Freezer) but scored 29799. Jumps from 4800mhz to 500-ish-mhz every 2 seconds :( and just 7K points on a 10min multicores test instead of 14/15k! CPU Multicore (w/ PBO auto) - scored 705 with peak temp 59. One problem is it uses vary little ram so things like shader compiling is games can show instability and even be more demanding on core oc than r23. Hey everyone! Just built my first gaming rig and everything runs really fine games without crashes (had few BSODS at first) but then I updated to the lastest BIOS version 0904 and then the 1002 and everything is run smooth now except the Cinebench r24 version like you can see here there’s weird colors wash downs and few slowdowns which won’t be on the Cinebench r23 version which downloaded With and without PBO(4. 80GHz 2… I did a Cinebench R23 test just now and got 11753(which isn't too bad I guess), maybe the standards changed on the new 2024 version, it got me worried for a sec will try to do the cpu vcore thing, does it increase performance, does it affect temperature much? Hello kind people of reddit, Apologies for the novice post please be nice haha, I am not tech savvy and just built my first PC for my work. Cinebench 2024 released. Before this update, the CPU score in Cinebench R23 Multi Core was about 32. You've made my day. Sep 5, 2023 · Beyond the surface, Cinebench 2024 brings forth a host of performance-enhancing features. 3/4. All about the ASUS Zephyrus G14 & G15. AI Tweaker Ai Overclock Tuner [XMP II] This is 2024 and it's more "R27" in traditional naming. No thermal throttling during test. I've consistently been getting average scores of around ~36600 but the advertised scores for 7950x are around ~38000+. Best for 10 min run: 35,322. At defaults priority it hits around Im trying to overclock my ryzen 3200g. Hi all! I’ve recently built a new sff pc (an NR200P Max) and the 7800X3D I’ve put in it is getting low cinebench r23 scores (seeing most online scores at 18k or above whereas mine are sitting anywhere from 17-17. E-Cores. Might try -30 next but I guess these scores are looking more around the average of what others get. ) Fwiw I haven’t scored over 39k on cinebench. The Z1 has 8 cores and the M2 Max (MacBook Pro) has 12, each score into about 11k and 15k points on this particular benchmark, respectively. 15500 is an ok score but not hanging in with high end water cooling, the 700 cb r23 point difference shows that especially the good runs, that are 800 points or more higher than your scores. Draws a healthy 350 W. Temperatures around 70-75C using a PS120SE at 24C room temperature Losing around 10-15% performance to run the chip cold and stable seems like the sweet spot for me (using a bad/budget z790 maxsun motherboard, any undervolt makes it crash). My temps max out at around 80°C. Was wondering what your scores are, and if there's anything I can do to push it higher without heading into danger. I then do a quick stress test with 7Zip and a h264 video encode with handbrake. I also have the 5700g in a SFF build and I average around the 15200 range for CineBench R23. - Single core (PBO enabled) I’m seeing 69C average temp with 4. You can contribute to our collective knowledge base by submitting your Cinebench result here . 8 with pbo curve set Searched for this before having my Deck in hands but was not able to find anywhere. Can anyone explain how you could achieve an MP ratio higher than the core count? As it's well known already, anyone with an AMD gpu gets absurdly low results for the GPU test, some kind of bug. As mentioned in the title, I ran cinebench r23 multicore and single core tests for my i5 12400 and the multicore score was in 5220 and single core… Skip to main content Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home Cinebench 2024 goes from the 14700 to 15300 which is still really low but all in all I think I'm fine with this. Nobody is going to use a dragstrip with turns (Cinebench 2024), they would go to a traditional dragstrip (R23) or a more realistic track (Geekbench, PC Mark). 76, final score of 1599. . PC Specs: CPU: 3700x GPU: 3080 TUF OC Mobo: TUF X570 Plus RAM: 32gig 3600mhz CL19 PSU: RMx 650W OS: Windows 10 Pro AID64 is a form of stress, Cinebench is another form regardless of using it as a benchmarker, one is always going to be more stressful than the other. For the Cinebench runs attached I did set the Cinebench application priority to "High". Basically Cinebench 2024 moves away from the whole reason Cinebench was used as a benchmark to begin with. Which is why x3d cpus do no better on Cinebench, and it scales completely linearly with cores. 3k in cinebench r23 multi core, a 1255u should definitely score more Decided to run cinebench r23(from Microsoft store), Liquid freezer 2 max speed 45C max single core, 67C max multi core. im using 13600k and I'm curious to see . See our regularly updated list of all CPUs tested in the Cinebench 2024 & R23 benchmarks (single and multi-core results). In gaming it's usually around 55-65c. 05ghz the whole time(no oc). 39v (have you tried reducing it further? bro ,. Reply reply Top 1% Rank by size My Cinebench R23 multithreaded score with everything left at stock except PBO enabled in the BIOS currently sits at 27976. Which was a score of 37448. The exact model is Dell Latitude 5431 14", DDR4-3200-32GB, 2TB SSD, Win10 Enterprise, 400nits monitor with all the extra cameras(not sure why IR & all that was necessary). Any higher 10 minutes scores from Intel i9-13980HX? Or is this the fastest 10 minute Cinebench R23 laptop score ever? Asus Zephyrus Duo 16. 5 engine. dont know what cpu or settings your running. Unfortunately, after some Windows or driver update, the performance dropped a bit, but remember that the laptop just came to market. But cinebench isn't rendering an image. PC Specs: CPU: 3700x GPU: 3080 TUF OC Mobo: TUF X570 Plus RAM: 32gig 3600mhz CL19 PSU: RMx 650W OS: Windows 10 Pro At fixed 4. IMHO the only use case that might go against the general opinion is single core app, provided the cooling solution on both laptop are equal. This is with 13 fans and Kraken Z73. I got 593 on mine with cinebench 2024. Cinebench also doesn't take into account the internal latency of the CPU and memory performance in general, because those aren't important when rendering that particular scene. Reply reply No instability at idle or light loads but I have had issues under specific heavy stress loads. With better cooling that allowed the processor to max out, it would be 50% faster, but that's difficult to achieve in a nice-looking laptop. 2. As for the rest. Is this a score Got 2243 on Cinebench 2024 and 39645 on Cinebench R23. Anybody else having issues overclocking on this compared to r23? First day working with 2024 and crashed twice already Cinebench 2024 doesnt support Arc The problem is that It gets throttling as soon as it reaches 80/85 degrees in Cinebench. Unfortunately the only quick to find ipc tests are in cinebench r23 where the memory and cache usage are extremely unrealistically low so it looks like 0 ipc difference from that but it isn't the case in the majority of even non gaming tasks Hence the flair rumour. CB 2024 made the news, not because AMD GPUs are slow with it, it made the news because support for AMD''s HIP is extremly rare compared to NVIDIA's CUDA. R23 has way higher (For reference my 5900x ~8500 point in R20 and ~22500 in R23) and harder to remember and perception. i like this type of screenshots bro :) Cinebench R23: 26551 this score really good with 90c ,. Cinebench is almost entirely floating point. Cinebench R23 i7-8700k OC 5. That's a good score. 1790 with PL1=PL2=155W. From Zen1 (Ryzen 2000 series) to Zen3+ (Ryzen 6000 series), please join us in discussing the future of mobile computing. I am not sure if I may have a mounting issue, but seems to be running normally? Thoughts??? Cinebench cares little for ram speed as it is almost entirely cpu performance based. All things overclocking go here. R23 tests show my CPU is right on par with the many many benchmarks on stock settings. 3-4. I'm just curious to see if it can actually beat the 4700U and a 15W Tiger Lake CPU in Cinebench now. ) Discussion I see both of them are often mentioned for benchmarking but not sure which one gives the best result, I want to bench mark both CPU and GPU, and possibly RAM too. We already had C4D R26 2023 so this 2024 version should be R27. I haven't messed with throttlestop or intel XTU yet. Undervolt via ThrottleStop to -150mv on core and cache. USE THE SEARCH BEFORE POSTING!!! Get Linux Tips here https://asus-linux. R23 was using C4D R23 engine. Y cruncher is a much better stability test especially for ring and memory testing but r23 is fine for core oc stability testing. Anyway, A user from korea submit userbenchmark with multi threaded score +70% over 11700 (cinebench r23 score 14K) which also align with this post number. 35v 4133mhz DDR4 16GB Single core: 1282 Multi core: 8889 Water cooled @ 88°C avg. I've just noticed something, you are running the Cinebench stress test not the benchmark (that timer which reads 27:28 tells me that, the stress test results in lower scores over time due to heat buildup in this mode). The i9 14900k SP is 93, did I just get screwed on the silicon lottery or am I doing something wrong? i9-13980HX with 4090 Cinebench 2024 Scores Welcome to the Unofficial iRacing Reddit Community. Cinebench R23 vs 3DMark for benchmarking all hardware (CPU, GPU, RAM, etc. Cinebench R23. A community dedicated toward all things AMD mobile. So most of the posts I find --- everywhere, must use an older version of Cinebench, probably 2023/23, because of the massive numbers put in posts. This might be incredibly stupid but I want to try Cinebenc R24 and it has two downloads Cinebench 2024 for Windows X86_64 Cinebench 202 for Windows… Yep, i have do 14500 with 11800H but without liquid metal, with Honeywell ptm7950. 100Mhz) @ ~ 0. Run by Fans of the Worlds Leading Motorsport Simulation Game. CPU(Mutil-Core) 11966 CPU(Single Core) 1239 MP Ratio: 9. TLDR Cinebench shouldn’t be so popular. Just picked up the 5900x and ran a few benchmarks in cinebench r23, but I believe I'm underperforming a bit. For my testing I used the newest version of Cinebench R23 and the newest version of Windows 10(Build 20H2). Cinebench R23 Scores. 68. Is 17,000 to 17,350 points good for the I5 12600k on R23 multi thread? Those are the average scores i get in most of the runs i do but i see others get up to 17,600 points on it on stock settings (Mine is also stock) and wondering if this is normal and if anyone else is getting the same? My 13500 gets a 20 000+ pts score in multi core benchmark in Cinebench R23, which is waay better than 12600k, and thats with ddr4, also it only peaked at 59 degrees under full load Reply reply There is no problem, it depends which version of cinebench your running as those numbers change. Intel Arrow Lake Desktop CPU Whispers: Launching In October 2024, Core Ultra 200 Series, Lower Power Than Raptor Lake wccftech upvotes · comments How are some people getting like 14. (Still better than my 27mm low profile CNPS2X with fan!) I decided I'll probably use it with a quiet fan to constantly blow air out. Cinebench r23 seems to be more focused on CPU only based results which for me is usually my favourite. Random number are different thing. 6ghz all core I get 15k on cinebench but i throttle hard and it go down to 4. Just installed my 14900K and did a few Cinebench r23 runs. 875V @ 1905MHz GPU / 8000MHz RAM) . 35v pushing 5. Those 2 things alone get you 85% of your max improvements as it relates to BIOS tweaks. then do multicore test. 956-1. I'll test single r23 score today but I get 18200 for multi core on my 7800x3d. People use R20 instead of R23 cause R23 younger and everyone habit to score levels of R20. Did -20 and got to 1099 on Cinebench 24, and 18263 on R23, with max temp at around 84. This way we can start to compare scores after re-pasting. 4ghz all cores on cinebench for about a minute, then goes down to 4. AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX Cinebench R23 (Undervolted -26 mv): 36,565 for single run. 66x PC Specs: Operating System Windows 10 Home 64-bit CPU Intel Core i7 10700K @ 3. CPU temperature when running R23 multi for 10 minutes: 90C in the beginning, 85C by the end Benchmarks on battery: 3DMark Time Spy: 2730 graphics, 9454 CPU Cinebench R23 single run: 14299 multi, 1313 single Cinebench R23 10 minutes: 14210 multi, 1342 single CPU limits on battery: Lenovo Intelligent Cooling + Windows Balanced: 39W Cinebench takes 10 minutes to run and the CPU reaches maximum temperature of 100C relatively quickly, so this multi-core score reflects thermal throttling. 45ghz). It pretty much ties the M2 Max in single threaded performance, but loses by roughly the same number of cores in multi-core performance. 5 was using C4D R11. Please use our Discord server Get HWInfo, run Cinebench and watch for Core Distance to TjMAX and Core Thermal Throttling. As you can see in the picture it just renders a black screen and gives me an absurdly high score. 15v range 2600x 5700x3d difference; Cinebench R15 (multi core) 1355 2271 +68% Cinebench 2024 (multi core) 461 776 Nanoreview has geekbench & cinebench r23 scores for all M3 chips, there are consistent improvements across the board - most drastic ones for the M3 vs M2 max. You need to look to other benchmarks to see improvements from ram speed - gaming benchmarks will show greater gains - but do bare in mind that huge increases in memory bandwidth and reductions in latency rarely manifest themselves as huge improvements in any Reaching out to the community, getting low cinebench scores 2024 for my I714700KF. Clockspeed on all cores about 4. Does these scores for the… Welcome to the official subreddit of the PC Master Race / PCMR! All PC-related content is welcome, including build help, tech support, and any doubt one might have about PC ownership. and vcore 1. Make sure you have a negative PBO and XMP enabled for your memory profile. 6” laptop. 0GHz AVX Offset 1 @ 1. I have to test if the curve is stable but it survived cinebench 2024 (I know its not a proper stress test). Only other application open was amd ryzen master. 8 ghz single core peak, mostly hovering at 4. Only using igpu right now, using 4 pc6000 CL36 dimms, so not particularly optimal. I see online a lot of people using a software Cinebench to test CPU performance. It’s mostly for flexing muscles on CPUs with many E-cores. I get 1680-1750 depending on power settings versus 1900 score most people seem to get. At stock with voltage tuned -75mV it was pulling aroubd 70w package sustained and sustained 4. I use single core app all day long for work and I tend to believe +100 cinebench (r23) points can make a slight difference. I've seen people crushing 3000 in r23 multicore, and way past 1400 in port royal with my specs, so I'm a bit salty about how bad I am at overclocking, haha. Hello, I just ran cinebench on my new i9 14900k and Im only getting a score of 2000 and 36k on cinebench r23, which is way less than what I got on my 13900k, all stock-asus settings on both. My Laptop is through work as well. Hey everyone,I wanted to share my undervolted CPU's Watts vs Cinebench R23 Graph. I had a laptop with an i7-8850H 6c/12t and it scored 8. P-Cores remain the same, and are the E-Cores as to compete here? That's the question. That's what I'm seeing, however, in 14:56 the power draw from the wall while running cinebench the M1 against the 12700H is 7W vs 24W on single-core and 40/43W vs 56/147W for multicore. My 14900K Sp score is 98, with P cores rated at 110 and E at 75. This is on an ASUS ProArt Z790 Creator WiFi board with an EK 360 AIO. No temp issues DDR43200 AOrus Z690 board RTX 4090. Okay, in other words, it's less reliable of real world CPU performance than even Cinebench. 9W Interesting and upon a quick Google search it looks like it uses 3 times the memory as R23 and requires 6 times the computational effort. Te aconsejo que si no tienes ryzen máster lo instales y prueba con la curva manual a 1,18v a 5350Mh y aplicar, directamente se pondrán a funcionar todos los núcleos a esa frecuencia y en cinebench r23 no pasarás de 70grados consumiendo entre 90-95w(125w de stock y 95grados)una enorme diferencia obteniendo 1970 puntos en single core y 15600 I have an AMD Ryzen 5 5600X processor, and my Cinebench R23 multicore score is 10362, while the single core score is 1348, giving an MP ratio of 7. I have the ID Cooling IS-47K for a cooler and it keeps it below 80deg with offset set to -23. Go into Cinebench settings and change it so the benchmark only executes once and run again. Anyways, my current OC gives me 4. 5 ghz all cores for much longer and temps stay at 60 for good bit before reaching the high 70s. Oh, and an additional note, I also did a benchmark on CPU-Z and the results are Single-Thread 666 and Multi-Thread (20T) 6632. Could I get some 1280p model users to post their Cinebench R23 scores (multicore and single core)? Laptop must be plugged in to actually let the chip go as fast as it can. Maybe due to thermals or power limit but I’ve seen 1255U’s score more in R23. The TDP appears completely open/configurable with the MSI GP66 15. Temps would jump up to 70-80 pretty quick. Your numbers are fine. 2ghz on all cores and scores 13. With a threefold increase in memory footprint compared to Cinebench R23, the software caters to the memory-intensive demands of modern projects. 45Ghz (the 12900k was clocked to 7ghz to hit 40000k, the 7950x smashed that to 4800 at 6. Zen3+ on laptops wouldn't go pass 15000 points even with 100W TDP. Now running 4ghz cache, everything with really low voltage because my laptop cooling can't support more than 120w on the cpu without throttling. 2k on the multi core Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Zen4, RDNA3, EPYC, Threadripper, rumors, reviews, news and more. At least as far as potential is concerned, it's certainly better than the Scar 18. I also found this to be a worse issue when pushing the E cores just past what they like, they don't have as much wriggle room. => at least there is now something to measure AMD vs NVIDIA GPUs in a typical workload I'm using the Alpine 12 passive heatsink. 3 and eventually 4. But the Processor only has 6 cores. My multicore score was around 19500 while my single core score was 1523. 287K subscribers in the overclocking community. org Join the Discord httpsdiscord. 500V I gett idle temps of ~ 48-54 C at room temps 27-30 C. If they all pass, temps are good and games don't crash I'm happy to say its stable. AID64 is a form of stress, Cinebench is another form regardless of using it as a benchmarker, one is always going to be more stressful than the other. I've noticed my Cinebench R23 scores are somewhat lower than advertised. For example first generation Ryzen CPUs do relatively well in cinebench but due to their very high internal latency they perform significantly worse in games compared to Cinebench 2024 Pro 7, 4090, 32GB GPU: 22248 LOW CINEBENCH R23 SCORE Reddit is dying due to terrible leadership from CEO /u/spez. Laptop Legion 5 Pro (5800H + 3070 mobile 0. Stock 4. I've heard that cinebench do benchmarks differently and I'm happy that the 3d benchmark gave fine results COMMENT=These are your MAXON CINEBENCH R23 results. But overall that chip in particular will have little variance in overclocking compared to Not many 13700HX benchmarks online so doing my part and sharing my Cinebench R23 scores. It really comes down to the vf lottery namely what ever your cpus 5. When doing Cinebench R23 looped runs & boosts to correctly SC-1619 MC-21832(PBO) and max temp 78 C. 7 GHz svid is. Here is the score of SteamDeck with it's custom AMD Van Gogh APU in Cinebench r23: Multitreaded: 4436 Single: 977 Ratio: 4. The results I posted are with the gigabyte gaming x DDR4 version. HOLY FUCK 97C max peak is fucking insane Description of Original Problem: Lower than average scores on Cinebench R23 especially on single-core benchmark. For example my laptop gets 1740 in R23 single core but only 103 in 2024. like 1. Another thing to consider is with high end water cooling and proper tuning scores of 16000-16200 are easily attainable with a bit of work and dedication. 7k in Cinebench R23 multi core? I saw even you got these scores on one of your videos with a XMG laptop when you set the CPU power limit at only 80w, I'm out here pulling 95W on a legion 5 pro and only scoring 14. 5k with EXPO enabled, PBO set to enabled, and CB23 set to high priority). Learn to overclock, ask experienced users your questions, boast your… Cinebench R23 Scores: 15495 pts (Multi Core) Cinebench 2024 Scores: 982 pts (Multi Core) From searching around it seems my R23 scores are quite low, with the average being around 20-22k? If anyone could help and provide some guidance on how to try and resolve this it would be much appreciated! It sometimes hits high 80s, but that is running Cinebench R23 (19. e. CB24 finally includes GPUs and shows just how big the gap is. go to advanced settings and advanced benchmark. 54x Got my Deck today, put Windows 10 on SD card and measured this. At the very least, those "estimates" need to be rounded to no more than two significant figures. My 9900k is overclocked at 1. Multi = 30015 and Single Core = 2030 R24 show Multi = 1630 and Single Core = 120 Can't download r23 anymore. I cannot find information to suggest my test is fine or not: Cinebench 2024 Multi-Core: 660 pts Single Core: 100 pts Cinebench r23: Multi-Core: 11058 pts Single Core: 1692 pts Cinebench 2024 scores. Power seems to cap at 250w. Did 7min per core of prime95 and they were all fine at -30 but now running y-cruncher hina preset and have passed 14/16 cores @ -30, and another @ -6, the last core passed once at -30 then failed next time. On my Asus G18 the only thing I have done is apply the -80 undervolt in the bios and it scored 33,091 in multicore cinebench r23. It's a decent overclocker for CPU, a little buggy with memory overclocking beyond XMP profile and if you're doing a fresh windows 11 install onto an M. It's pretty clear the score IPC is no where near a P-Core as the 7950X blew the 12900k out of the water at a clock speed of 6. This Cinebench release heavily favors NVidia architecture right now. The R-something naming is in fact matching C4D versions. I haven't yet stress tested recently anything more than Cinebench R23, where it peaks at around 85C with no fan. 10384pts Other: Seems to pull 110W, crashed at 1950MHz Oh interesting, i have 12500h as the CPU which gets around 14300 at 83W in cinebench r23 and 819 in 2024, my guess there maybe something to do with the cpu and even maybe the ram as 6GB of the 3060 fills like very quick in that benchmark I'm still playing around with my OC on all fronts (and tbh having an awful time). Nothing weird here. cb r23 multi - 29158 cb r23 single - 1592 Link to PR benches wow,. Also, don't really wanna make another thread on this but my fans are sounding a little weird during high loads. 10 votes, 10 comments. If anyone has any related graphs for similar CPUs ,pls link if you find this kind of graphs for 12th,13th gen and AMDs too (only stable undervolted cpu's) , Saw a comment on the YouTube video about the R9 7945HX in the Duo 16 in which notebookcheck reviews stated in a reply that the R9 7945HX was capable of around a 30K multicore score in Cinebench R23 at 70W. Only had option to download 2024 but not a lot of comparative data out there for my 5700x3d. From my experience having tested 2 14900k chips on an apex encore / 253 PL1PL2 / 400a locked cores at 57x will net around 39500 without xmp. now its 2024 and everyone is still using 4/5nm for high performance parts so there's always a chance they had to respin to make up for TSMC's slowing node gains. i have overclock it but my laptop, even with unlocked BIOS and all the pl unlocked, still drop to 80w if the cpu consume more than 100w, and I have plenty of cooling capacity, so the cinebench run can't sustain 4. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. So R11. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment 5950x Cinebench 2024 PS. For example the oc'ed cpu of a friend does pull around 65watts in games . 6k and 14. ofkcr bmus pxxgx cvfmxo xqsob uzhosl ywyyt lctcaskt ofawgvw yngoz